1. castlebravo
   Member

   
   its the newset anti libreal encylopidea and im gonig to go see if i can get us an artical in it. but I will need some help by steve or boo chris or ryan to become a member to help make the page the way they want it , i just want to bring this to to the mods and see who would like to help make the artical.

   a forty of jd's will do the trick
   Posted 1 year ago Login to Send PM

2. steveoutdoorrec
   Administrator

   

   castlebravo Escribió:

   its the newset anti libreal encylopidea and im gonig to go see if i can get us an artical in it. but I will need some help by steve or boo chris or ryan to become a member to help make the page the way they want it , i just want to bring this to to the mods and see who would like to help make the artical.

   
   
   From what I've read concervopedia only wants articles that further the conservative agenda. Like nothing on evolution, just creationism. Not sure how they would take an article on SMH or even if they would allow it.
   
   What does Chris think?
   
   I've done my battle for inclusion in Wikipedia. That was a long month.
   Posted 1 year ago Login to Send PM

3. castlebravo
   Member

   
   i can ask them and see if they will allow it , i think they will, i dont know why but i just do

   a forty of jd's will do the trick
   Posted 1 year ago Login to Send PM

4. castlebravo
   Member

   
   i asked them and they said that if the content was ok then you an have fun with it ( content as in no swearing and stuff like that)

   a forty of jd's will do the trick
   Posted 1 year ago Login to Send PM

5. steveoutdoorrec
   Administrator

   
   Then go ahead. When you get an article up post a link for us to check it out.
   
   A few hints on how to get it accepted if they work like Wikipedia:
   
   Think it through.
   Make the layout flow well.
   It should read like an encyclopedia article which it is. Use complete sentences.
   Use spell check and grammar check.
   
   Our Wiki article was started by someone that didn't use correct spelling and grammer and that put up all kinds of roadblocks for us.
   
   Do not make it a copy of the Wikipedia article. (although it should contain all the same information)
   Posted 1 year ago Login to Send PM

6. castlebravo
   Member

   
   na why boather......... im not going to be posting anymore for a long time if ever, maby some othe time , if you can make an account you can get started on it then i can come in later to help finish it

   a forty of jd's will do the trick
   Posted 1 year ago Login to Send PM

7. steveoutdoorrec
   Administrator

   

   castlebravo Escribió:

   na why boather......... im not going to be posting anymore for a long time if ever, maby some othe time , if you can make an account you can get started on it then i can come in later to help finish it

   
   
   I did my thing on wikipedia and frankly don't have the time right now to do that again. That and IMO conseropedia is going to be full of mis-information designed to further the ultra-conservative veiw point and will not be fact based in most cases. Give me varifiable science over belief any time.
   
   So why are you not going to post for "long time"? Is it because you've reached the rank of shit-kicker and it looks good on the resume? :D
   Posted 1 year ago Login to Send PM

8. castlebravo
   Member

   
   it does look good , but im not quittin till im comander in ass kickin and name takin now that will look good :) , i sent you a pm expalning
   
   
   i am a royal republican / concervitive , the only thing i dont like is the religon part because i nkow all religon ( ALL RELIGON) is bull shit by the way thats proven too the rest of the stuff concervitives like is awsome :)

   a forty of jd's will do the trick
   Posted 1 year ago Login to Send PM

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.